"Just look at those curved loins and muscular buttocks--just what we'd expect from a fit, racy bitch," I overheard. But by the time I managed to get a peek at the telly, Glyn must've already changed the channel: something about Birmingham, Crufts, and an Australian Shepherd taking the pastoral round.
I teeter between being cuted out (as in, I find every dog so cute that I squeal as one affected by severe cuteness) and being mildly piqued by the limiting of genetic pools to preserve the idea of breed. It's the cultural and ethnic mutt in me--the bitch, one might say--that finds the frighteningly detailed classifications of these carefully bred pedigrees, or purebreds, distasteful.
Don't get me wrong: I rooted for the Welsh Springer, and my family had a little tricolour King Charles Cavalier, rightly named for pedigree and year with the letter H, bred by the Renard family of La Ferté-sous-Jouarre, whose mother was a French national champion and whose puppies were worth a grade A liver on the Parisian black market.
And she was lovely, but every overbred breed has their weakness: H died of mitral valve disease at ten, to which Cavaliers are prone. Even before their first birthdays, their puppy hearts have often begun to murmur quietly--a gentle gurgle I thought I could hear if I pressed my ear against her chest. This generally develops over their lifetime and very often leads to heart failure. It's the chorus of genetic prophesy that comes with the tragically purebred Cavalier: MVD, syringomyelia, epilepsy, cataracts, and various sorts of dysplasia.
But what is the answer? Surely not breeding...out? Why, that would lead to the gradual extinction of the breed! And there is nothing, nothing in the world to fear more than the dwindling down of breed (except perhaps haemophilia and Mandibular prognathism...). Imagine for example, several nightmarish turns around the apple bin, and not finding a Braeburn, gasp!--once a hybrid itself, now a well established breed of its own.
The Braeburn, which I happen to be eating right now, is characterised by a light green skin with blushing streaks. It is crisp, sweet, and full of a flavour that, if grown and handled properly, can develop further with ageing. But, it is particularly prone to disease (apple scab, powdery mildew, and other nasty things I can neither remember nor spell) and growers often need foliar calcium sprays to maintain the fine, firm flesh. It is so difficult, that home growers are actually discouraged from planting the Braeburn in their gardens with the threat of poor pollination and disease.
The portmanteau of cultivated + variety = cultivar, and is used to describe the sorts of apples I am most familiar with. Granny Smith and Golden Delicious, for example, are cultivars. Unlike AOC, which protects the names and methods of specific regions, or the idea of terroir, which ties taste to the particular patch of soil on which it grew, the term cultivar describes a group of plants that share a particular attribute or combination of attributes regardless of location.
So that the Braeburn can bloom early and ripen late a hemisphere off from Braeburn, New Zealand where it was first discovered in 1952. And though a few Kiwis might be brassed off and say: ta, but bugger off with your apples, our brilliant Braeburns are a box of budgies at our bun-fights!
Well even if they say that--and I'm sure no one has ever, ever said that--there's still nothing to stop Chile and China, two major apple exporters, from selling Braeburns with the same genetic identity and growing process. Not to mention the US and UK, which also grow them in significant proportion to other popular apples.
If you truly believe in place as part of taste--soil nutrients, sunshine, rain-fall, drainage etc. this is bad news. If you think terroir is an imaginary monster in the French oral tradition used to terroirise school children into eating locally, it doesn't matter so much.
My breakfast, now a browning core, was from Washington--which imported from New Zealand in the eighties and found the fruit quite popular with American consumers. In Washington, the Braeburn season is coming to an end right now--late September through May. But just as the season ends in the US, it begins in Chile where the seasons are opposite and the Braeburn will export well into July.
But don't go getting the idea that cultivars allow for some sort of collective, global ownership that threatens apple identity: apple identity is changing and cultivars can be patented. Patented! And in the US, the person who has invented, accidentally discovered, or asexually reproduced a distinct and new variety of plant--probably with the help of well-trained bumblebees, a lightning harness run by hamsters, and a full moon--is protected for up to twenty years. Which means other enthusiasts are legally restricted from replicating, selling, or using the plant in any way.
This means that right now, there could be some trees on which the Apple to end all Apples is ripening, and one lucky bastard napping in their shade, who has patented their genetic identity and is not required to share his discovery in any way. Is he curing a genetic disease with a perfect hybrid? Getting off his face on virgin trodden cider? Is he a member of la Confrerie, dissatisfied with the Reine des Reinettes, and committed to developing a more perfect apple for the Tarte Tatin?
A woman cannot hold an apple in her hands without alluding to moral glitch, but are we moving, slowly, towards a perfect apple--is that what it (Everything) has all been about: a lesson in divine recovery? Are we capable of apple perfectability--breeding and breeding until a precise combination is reached, and we unravel into enlightened, unbound elementary particles?
Unbound elementary particles? A lesson in divine recovery? What half-baked nonsense! I mean, we're talking apples here, not puppies! Seriously, get a job. No honey, a real job.

Hm, I had actually never heard about various apple lines being patented. Interesting. It brought to mind wierd illegal rings of apple smugglers with eye patches and barrels of delicious contrabrand cultivars. haha.
Anyway, the patenting of genetic biology is quite an irritating concept to me. But I don't completely understand it. Still, I feel that some people have pushed this patenting business to the limit. For example, turmeric has been used for mellinia in various indian treatments, and some Einstein in the US decided to patent it! The gaul!!! Then the neem tree was used as a natural pesticide and for treatments like chickenpox, and the essential chemical attribited to this tree has been patented too. Quite depressing.
Next, people will patent yoga, apple pie, and light.
Ranjan, although I'm pretty sure you do know a lot more about all this than I do, from what I read, it seems any plant cultivars (strawberries too) follow those patent rules in the US--although I got bored after a while and stopped reading, er, so, there's probably a lot more to it...
I cannot believe that about turmeric and neem, how ridiculous!
But speaking of what's next after yoga, apple pie and light, it might interest you to know that I have a patent pending on the quadruple exclamation mark (!!!!). I only tell you this because I noticed the triple exclamation mark in your comment. So if in future, you wish to express more shock than what the triple allows, at say, the patenting of the quadruple exclamation mark (!!!!) I'm afraid you'll have to buy that extra ! from me. =)
Also, thank you so much for visiting and making me laugh!
I hope you don't think I left because of your dicing up my comments! Anyhow, back again. What will happen when they've bred the perfect apple? Will god sue us for copyright infringment? Will He sneak into our gardens and take a surreptitious nibble? All kinds of things, by the way, are patented, and it's pretty grim. Apparently, if any seed from a patented plant passes onto a farm (via those pesky natural processes like wind and water)which hasn't paid a royalty, the biotech companies can sue!
Keep up the baked and half-baked ideas.
oh right, more here on plant patents and the growth of monoculture:
http://imomus.livejournal.com/2006/04/21/
If, by some unlikely event I come across a topic more appalling to me than patenting life, the universe and everything, then, in stead of my usual triple exclamation mark, i think I'll take to sulking and living a life of penance on a grassy knoll. That or i'll one up you with a quintuplet exclamation (!!!!!). ha!
sigh, i need coffee.
On the other hand, what is a patent? its nothing more than a smug piece of paper stating that someone owns something. Just like those pieces of paper proclaiming that a star in the sky has been named after someone's sweetheart. Although the latter example is romantic and all, neither the star nor the knowledge of a gene or anything else for that matter ever became someones just because a piece of paper said so. Its so contextual. (i'm not sure if any of what i said made sense :S)
Hi Neil! So glad you're back, and thanks for the link, I just read it--do you know that pirate personally?
Ranjan, perfect sense. Aha, the quintuplet exclamation, why didn't I think of that! Oh, and speaking of punctuation, I just learned how to bold and italicise yesterday! So forgive the overuse...
hehe, i did notice your boldness ...